An overview and comparison of today’s single-board micro computers

As we have concluded earlier, there are quite a few single-board micro computers out there today to choose from. Some of them offer better performance and more memory than others, some of them have a great variety of connectors while others only have the necessary minimum. A part of these devices can connect to custom hardware through general purpose input-output pins, while others are more integrated and less customizable. Most of them are based on the ARM architecture, which restricts their use to operating systems like Linux, Android, etc, but a few surprise us with an x86 design and can even run Windows. Although they are generally small, there still are significant differences between them in size. Some of them target home users while others are built for hackers and computer experts. And last, but not least, the price of these micro computers can differ a lot. So in order to get a feel of what is on the market today, let’s have an overview of the most famous micro PCs and compare them in different categories.


Raspberry Pi

Raspberry Pi

Designed and marketed by the non-profit Raspberry Pi Foundation, manufactured by Sony UK and sold by Farnell / Element14, the Raspberry Pi is, without a doubt, the most famous small computer (single-board micro PC) today. Its creation revolves around a noble cause, The Raspberry Pi Foundation aims to give the world, especially children, a very cheap computer which they can use to learn programming and to put their creativity to work in general. Released in early 2012, the Raspberry Pi combines some very appealing hardware characteristics, like fairly good performance (the 700 Mhz ARM CPU can be overclocked to 1GHz; 256 MB memory for model A and 512 MB memory for model B), extremely low power consumption (1.5 W max for model A and 3.5 W max for model B), which makes it suitable for battery-powered independent projects, and custom connectivity to special hardware through programmable GPIO pins. Combine all this with a very low price (25$ for model A and 35$ for model B) and a large, helping community and you definitely have a winner if you want to choose a fairly good small computer which can run Linux for example (or Android, RISC OS, etc.) and which needs to run all kinds of applications that don’t need a lot of resources (for home use, for a small server or as part of a custom hardware system). It is probably the best choice also in case you want to take the easy road into the world of micro computers because of its popularity, which translates to a huge number of Raspberry Pi owners who can and will probably help you with any questions or problems that you may encounter.



Olimex A13 OLinuXino

Olimex A13 OLinuXino

The Olimex boards come in many flavors. There is the iMX233-OLinuXino-MAXI, the iMX233-OLinuXino-MICRO, the iMX233-OLinuXino-MINI or the iMX233-OLinuXino-WiFi. But the sweetest of them all is the A13-OLinuXino (available also i the A13-OLinuXino-MICRO and A13-OLinuXino-WIFI variants). Based on an AllWinner A13 Cortex-A8 processor running at 1GHz and a 3D Mali-400 GPU, equipped with 512 MB of RAM, a GPIO connector with 68/74 pins, 3 USB ports, a VGA connector and providing an SD card slot, this board is very similar to the Raspberry Pi. Just like it, it is based on an ARM architecture and can commonly run several Linux distributions or Android. It too can connect to custom hardware through GPIO. Both the performance and the price (45 Euros) are somewhat higher compared to the Raspberry Pi. This board does not have an HDMI connector. but it has a VGA one instead.

OLinuXino is completely open source, hardware and software. You can download the design files for it free of charge and build your own. The software that runs on it (typically Linux) is also free. In contrast with the Raspberry Pi, it is specifically designed to work in industrial environments, having a 6-16 VDC input connector, a noise immune design and a working temperature range of -25 to +85 Celsius degrees.


  • A13 Cortex-A8 processor at 1GHz, 3D Mali-400 GPU
  • 512 MB RAM (2 x 256Mbit x 8)
  • 6-16VDC input power supply, noise immune design
  • 3 + 1 USB hosts, 3 available for users, 1 leads to onboard pinout
  • 1 USB OTG which can power the board
  • SD-card connector for booting optional Linux image
  • VGA video output
  • Battery option and connector
  • LCD signals available on connector so you still can use LCD if you diasble VGA/HDMI
  • Audio output
  • Microphone input
  • 4 Mount holes
  • RTC PCF8536 on board for real time clock and alarms
  • 5 Keys on board for android navigation
  • UEXT connector for connecting addtional UEXT modules like Zigbee, Bluetooth, Relays, etc.
  • GPIO connector with 68/74 pins and these signals:
    • 17 for adding NAND flash;
    • 22 for connecting LCDs;
    • 20+4 including 8 GPIOs which can be input, output, interrupt sources;
    • 3x I2C;
    • 2x UARTs;
    • SDIO2 for connectinf SDcards and modules;
    • 5 system pins: +5V, +3.3V, GND, RESET, NMI
  • Dimensions: 120 x 120 mm (4.7×4.7”)




When it comes to performance, the Korean company that produces and sells ODROID-X2 really means business! Launched in late 2012, this single-board micro computer is the successor of the previous ODROID-X and is available for buying at The new version packs a 1.7 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 MPCore processor and 2 GB of memory. With such resources on board, Android flies on it and a full-blown Linux system such as Ubuntu also runs smoothly. Good looking 3D games pose no problem to the board, as the Mali-400 quad-core GPU clocked at 440MHz can deal with them easily. ODORID-X2 is all about performance, which it delivers in massive amounts, making it comparable to very low-end conventional computers. However it is still based on the ARM architecture, so don’t get your hopes high about running Windows on it (theoretically it is possible, but Windows is not free and that poses problems).

ODROID-X2 is probably one of the most serious rivals of the Raspberry Pi. It clearly beats the Pi to dust from a purely performance oriented point of view, but this  naturally means a considerably higher price, 135$ to be exact. That’s still not so bad considering what it is capable of. The video output is through a micro HDMI connector (1080p). It has a standard 3.5 mm audio jack, 10/100 Mbps Ethernet connector, no less than 6 USB ports and even GPIO connectors.


  • CPU: Samsung Exynos4412 Cortex-A9 Quad Core 1.7Ghz with 1MB L2 cache
  • GPU: Mali-400 Quad Core 440MHz
  • Memory: 2GB LP-DDR2 880Mega data rate
  • Video: micro HDMI connector (supports 1080p via HDMI cable (H.264 + AAC based MP4 container format))
  • Audio: HDMI and standard 3.5 mm jack (+ microphone jack)
  • LAN: 10/100 Mbps Ethernet with RJ-45 Jack (Auto-MDIX support)
  • USB: 6x standard high speed connectors
  • Storage: micro-USB card slot, full size SDHC slot, eMMC module socket
  • Power supply: 5V, 2A
  • Size: 9 * 9.4 cm




ODROID-U2 is the little brother of ODROID-X2. It is ultra-compact, only 4.8 * 5.2 cm in size, about half the size of a credit card. The fact that it is so small does not mean, however, that it is less muscular than the big brother. It has the same CPU, GPU and the same amount of memory, so performance is equally high, but the price is considerably lower: 89$. HDMI video output is kept, the same Ethernet connector remains, but there’s room for only 2 out of the 6 USB ports. The standard size SD card slot is also gone, but the micro-SD slot remains. There’s no default GPIO port on the ODROID-U2 because of its compact design, but a USB expansion card is available, which add GPIO pins. The default supported operating systems are, of course, the same: Android and Ubuntu, but it could probably easily run other Linux distributions and possibly some other operating systems too.


  • CPU: Samsung Exynos4412 Cortex-A9 Quad Core 1.7Ghz with 1MB L2 cache
  • GPU: Mali-400 Quad Core at 440MHz
  • Memory: 2GB LP-DDR2 880Mega data rate
  • Video: micro HDMI connector (supports 1080p via HDMI cable (H.264 + AAC based MP4 container format))
  • Audio: HDMI and standard 3.5 mm jack (+ microphone jack)
  • LAN: 10/100 Mbps Ethernet with RJ-45 Jack (Auto-MDIX support)
  • USB: 2x standard high speed connectors
  • Storage: micro-USB card slot, eMMC module socket
  • Power supply: 5V, 2A
  • Size: 4.8 * 5.2 cm




A micro computer that looks very similar to the Raspberry Pi is the BeagleBone. Announced in the last quarter of 2011, it is a lower cost successor of the BeagleBoard-xM. Equipped with a Sitara ARM Cortex-A8 processor running at 720 MHz, a 3D graphics accelerator, 256 MB of RAM, an Ethernet connector, a single USB port, a micro-SD card slot and two 46-pin expansion connectors (wow, that’s a lot of GPIO pins!) the BeagleBone delivers performance comparable with that of the Raspberry Pi model B, but at a considerably higher price (89$). The encouraged operating systems for it are Angstrom, Android 4.0 and Ubuntu. It also has several expansion boards called “capes”.


  • Processor
    • 720 MHz super-scalar ARM Cortex-A8 (armv7a)
    • 3D graphics accelerator
    • ARM Cortex-M3 for power management
    • 2x Programmable Realtime Unit 32-bit RISC CPUs
  • RAM: 256 MB
  • Connectivity
    • USB client: power, debug and device
    • USB host
    • Ethernet
    • 2x 46 pin headers
      • 2x I2C, 5x UART, I2S, SPI, CAN, 66x 3.3V GPIO, 7x ADC




A development board type micro computer strikingly similar to the BeagleBone and to the Raspberry Pi is the Cubieboard. It has an ARM Cortex-A8 (NEON, VFPv3, 256KB L2 cache) processor running at 1 GHz, a Mali-400 GPU (OpenGL ES) and 1GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 480 MHz. In addition it brings to the table 4GB of built-in NAND Flash memory for storage purposes, but it also has a micro-SD card slot and one  SATA connector for external storage. The rest of the stuff is also pretty much what the standard is today: 2 conventional USB ports, an Ethernet port and an HDMI video output. The Cubieboard also supports IR connectivity. As a development board, it too offers a multitude of GPIO pins: 96 of them! That certainly is a big advantage. Supported operating systems are Android and Linux (Ubuntu, Debian, etc.). Compared to what this board offers the price is quite fair: 49$.

The Cubieboard can be thought of as a Raspberry Pi with a little better performance, more memory, integrated storage and way more GPIO pins, at a slightly higher price. But the community and the support around it is a lot thinner for now, which can be a serious disadvantage if you need some help working with it.


  • CPU: 1 GHz ARM Cortex-A8, NEON, VFPv3, 256KB L2 cache
  • GPU: Mali-400, OpenGL ES
  • RAM: 1 GB DDR3 @480MHz
  • HDMI 1080p Output
  • 10/100M Ethernet
  • On-board storage: 4Gb NAND Flash
  • 2x USB Host, 1 micro SD slot, 1 SATA, 1 IR
  • 96 extend pin including I2C, SPI, RGB/LVDS, CSI/TS, FM-IN, ADC, CVBS, VGA, SPDIF-OUT, R-TP, …


Gooseberry Board

GooseBerry Board

A direct rival of the Raspberry Pi and very similar to BeagleBone and Cubieboard is the Gooseberry Board. It was released in mid 2012 in the form of a limited supply of 500 boards which were sold almost immediately, even with the restriction that a person could only buy one board. Later in 2012 another batch of Gooseberry Boards became available in the store but they too have sold out quickly. According to the manufacturer’s claims, this board can deliver three times the performance of the Raspberry Pi with 256 MB or memory. It certainly has a faster CPU based on a newer ARM technology, an Allwinner A10 processor running at 1 GHz, which can theoretically be overclocked to 1.5 GHz, but in practice Android was unstable above 1.2 GHz. Thanks to its better CPU it can also run Ubuntu, which isn’t really supported on the Rasbpery Pi. It also has a quite good GPU, a Mali-400, and 512 MB of RAM. Just like the Cubieboard, it possesses 4GB of built-in storage. IT does not have an Ethernet port but it compensates with built-in WiFi. Analog video is also not supported, but that can be overcome by using the HDMI video output. The standard 3.5 mm audio jack is present, but instead of standard USB ports a single mini-USB connector is available. For external storage there is a micro-SD slot. There are no GPIO pins on the board, which might be a major downside for those who wish to work with custom hardware devices.

It seems that the performance delivered by the Gooseberry Board is indeed higher than that of the Raspberry Pi. However this is reflected in the price too (62$ vs 25/35$). Unlike the Raspberry Pi, which is sold in massive quantities, this board is available in very limited batches and only from time to time.


  • CPU: Allwinner A10 1 GHz, overclockable to 1.5 GHz  (1.2 GHz highest stable overclock on Android)
  • GPU: Mali 400 MHz
  • Onboard Storage: 4GB
  • External storage: micro-SD memory card – 32GB max
  • Connectivity: WiFi (802.11 b/g/n), AC jack, 1x 3.5mm earphone jack, 1x mini-USB, 1x HDMI Out


Hackberry Board

HackBerry Board

Another rival of the Raspberry Pi, in many aspects also similar to the BeagleBone, Cubieboard and Gooseberry Board, is the Hackberry Board. Powered by an Allwinner A10 ARM Cortex-A8 processor running at 1.2 GHz and having 1GB of RAM, this micro computer seems to be able to deliver quite good performance. Its GPU is the commonly used Mali-400. Similarly to the Cubieboard and Gooseberry Board, it has 4GB of built in storage and it also has built in WiFi. As for connectivity, the board offers an HDMI video and audio output, a 3.5 mm microphone jack, 2 standard USB ports, an Ethernet port and a serial port, but no GPIO pins (again, a possible major downside for those who want to connect custom hardware to it). Extrenal storage is achieved through an SDHC card slot. Supported operating systems are Android, and Linux (Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, etc.). The Hackberry Board is sold at a price of 65$, which seems to be a fair one considering the offered performance.


  • CPU: 1.2GHz Allwinner A10 ARM Cortex-A8
  • GPU: Mali400 with hardware 3D acceleration and hardware video decoding
  • Serial port: 3.3v TTL 4-pin header
  • Audio input: 3.5mm microphone jack
  • Audio output: Audio over HDMI
  • USB: 2 x USB A 2.0 ports
  • Internal storage: 4GB NAND storage, 1.5GB available in user partition in Android
  • External storage: SDHC card slot supporting up to 32GB
  • Networking: 10/100 Ethernet, Realtek 802.11n WiFi
  • Memory: DDR3 512MB / 1GB, ~100MB is reserved for the GPU
  • Boot: Boot from SD card and internal storage via u-boot
  • OS: Android 4.0 ICS, Linux support
  • Digital video output: HDMI up to 1080p (cable not included)
  • Analog video output: 3.5mm composite AV, 3.5mm component Y/Pb/Pr (cables not included)
  • Power: NEMA 2-pin power adapter included Input AC 100-240 V – 0.4 A 50/60 Hz Output DC 5V


Chumby Hacker Board v1.0

Chumby Hacker Board

This board is quite different from the others. It does not focus on offering high performance, it is rather a low-end but still usable single-board micro computer, which is meant to be incorporated into all kinds of custom (“hack”) projects. At the heart of it is a Freescale iMX.233 processor running at 454 MHz and the available amount of memory is quite modest: 64 MB. It has no fancy graphics accelerator either and instead of the commonly used HDMI video output it uses composite video (3.5mm A/V output jack with stereo audio and NTSC/PAL composite video) to connect to a TV, for example. Clearly, not a system focused on performance. And yet it can run Linux, in fact it comes with a 100 MB Linux distribution on its micro-SD card, ready to go.

What this board excels at is the variety of possibilities of integration into custom hardware projects. It offers a great deal of connectivity  and interaction options, starting with more standard ones like the 3 SUB ports or the microphone input, but also providing unusual ones like the LCD controller, the speaker amplifier, the onboard joystick and accelerometer or the integrated Li-Ion/Polymer battery charger for independent off-grid projects. Obviously a multitude of GPIO pins (including PWM pins) and a serial port are not missing either.

The Chumby Hacker Board is primarily for people who already have experience with similar systems, or at least with some basic micro-controller projects and with Linux, of course. The price of this gadget is 89$.


  • Freescale iMX.233 processor running at 454 MHZ
  • 64 MB onboard RAM
  • Comes with 512MB uSD card with 100 MB Linux installation all ready to go
  • Dimensions are 3.9″ (100mm) x 2.4″ (60mm) x 0.75″ (20mm)
  • 3.3V I/O pins can talk to most sensors, motor drivers, etc. No struggling with 1.8V levels.
  • Low power, fanless CPU draws only 200 mA at 5V
  • Built-in Lithium Ion/Polymer battery charger and 5V boost converter for portable projects
  • Three USB ports!
  • 1.9W mono speaker amplifier into 4ohm (0.1″ JST onboard connector)
  • Microphone input (0.05″ JST onboard connector)
  • LCD controller with 2mm output port
  • 3.5mm A/V output jack with stereo audio and NTSC/PAL composite video
  • Quadrature encoder connections onboard
  • 5-way joystick on-board
  • MMA7455 3-axis +-2G to +-8G accelerometer on-board
  • 3.3V TTL serial port for easy shell access
  • Full GCC toolchain is ready for you to download and get crackin’!
  • Schematics, Gerbers and original layout files are available at the Wiki




The FOXG20 is a low-end micro computer from a performance-oriented point of view, it is meant to be embedded into custom hardware or it can run web servers, as it supports the Debian Linux OS. According to its purpose, the FOXG20 exposes two headers of 40 general purpose extension pins, so that it can be connected to all kinds of devices. The price of such a board is 184$, quite high, considering that similar devices, like the Raspberry Pi, for example, offer similar capabilities and higher performance.


  • CPU: Atmel ARM9 @ 400 Mhz
  • RAM: 64 MB
  • Internal storage: 256KB of flash memory for the bootloader
  • Extrenal storage: micro-SD card slot
  • Connectors:
    • 2x USB 2.0 ports (12 Mbits)
    • Ethernet 10/100 port
    • USB device port (12 Mbits)
    • Debug serial port (3.3 V)
    • 2x serial ports (3.3 V)
    • Serial port for 4DSystems oLed displays
    • GPIO lines (3.3 V)
      • 4 A/D converter lines,
      • I2C bus,
      • SPI bus
  • Power: 5 VDC power supply input
  • Real Time Clock with on-board backup battery
  • Average power consumption:  80 mA @ 5V (0.4 W) without micro-SD, Ethernet link, USB devices or other peripherals.


Pandaboard ES


Pandaboard ES successor of the Pandaboard, is also a single-board micro computer, a community supported development platform available since late 2011 at the price of 182$, a price quite high in comparison to how much the other similar single-board computers cost. It does offer nice performance, delivered by a Dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 MPCore CPU with Symmetric Multiprocessing at 1.2 GHz each and by the Imagination Technologies’ POWERVR SGX540 graphics core. It is equipped with 1GB of DDR2 memory. The connectivity options offered by the Pandaboard are similar to those seen on the competition, with the exception of a few extras. For video output (1080p full-HD by the way): HDMI connector and(!) DVI-D connector, also LCD expansion header. It also has 3.5 mm stereo audio output (and audio through HDMI), Ethernet, WiFi and BlueTooth for network connections, 2 USB ports and a camera expansion header. The main supported operating systems are Linux, Android and RISC OS.


  • CPU: Dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 MPCore with Symmetric Multiprocessing (SMP) at 1.2 GHz each.
  • GPU: Full HD (1080p) multi-standard video encode/decode Imagination Technologies’ POWERVR SGX540 graphics core supporting all major API’s including OpenGL® ES v2.0, OpenGL ES v1.1, OpenVG v1.1 and EGL v1.3
  • Memory: 1 GB low power DDR2
  • Display:
    • HDMI v1.3 Connector (Type A) to drive HD displays
    • DVI-D Connector (can drive a 2nd display, simultaneous display; requires HDMI to DVI-D adapter)
    • LCD expansion header
    • DSI Support
  • Audio
    • 3.5″  Audio in/out
    • HDMI Audio out
    • Sterio audio input support
  • Extrenal storage: Full size SD/MMC card cage with support for High-Speed & High-Capacity SD cards
  • Connectivity: Onboard 10/100 Ethernet
  • Wireless Connectivity:
    • 802.11 b/g/n (based on WiLink 6.0)
    • Bluetooth v2.1 + EDR (based on WiLink™ 6.0)
  • Expansion ports:
    • 1x USB 2.0 High-Speed On-the-go port
    • 2x USB 2.0 High-Speed host ports
    • General purpose expansion header (I2C, GPMC, USB, MMC, DSS, ETM)
    • Camera expansion header
    • LCD signal expansion using a single set of resistor banks
  • Debug
    • JTAG
    • UART/RS-232
    • 2 status LEDs (configurable)
    • 1 GPIO Button
    • Sysboot switch available on board
  • Dimensions
    • Height: 4.5″ (114.3 mm)
    • Width:  4.0″ (101.6 mm)
    • Weight: 2.88 oz (81.5 grams)


Snowball Board

Snowball Board

Snowball Board  is a small single-board computer which is meant to be used by hobbyists and designers in embedded systems. Built around ST Ericcson’s Nova A9500 SoC, it features a dual Cortex-A9 ARM processor clocked at 1 GHz and a Mali-400 GPU. It is equipped with 1GB of DDR2 RAM and an unusually high amount of built-in eMMC memory: 8 GB, which can be extended using the available micro-SD slot. Connectors include HDMI, composite-video, audio, Ethernet, and GPIO pins. It also has built-in WiFi and BlueTooth. The board runs Linux and Android and is available for around 247$.


  • CPU: ARM Dual Cortex-A9 @ 1GHz
  • GPU: Mali-400
  • RAM: 1GB DDR2
  • Internal storage: 8 GB eMMC
  • External storage: micro-SD card slot
  • Connectivity:
    • Ethernet
    • IEEE 802.11 b/g/n Wireless LAN
    • Bluetooth BT4.0/ BLE. (ex Antenna)
    • GPS (Ex. Antenna)
  • 3x Expansion Connectors (FSMC,HSI, Audio, MiPi CSI / Camera, LCD,MiPi DSI, UART, SPI, I2C, GPIO)
  • Dimensions: 8.5 x 8.5 cm





The Nitrogen6X is a high-end development board, with a quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 processor running at 1GHz and 1 GB of DDR3. It seems to put high emphasis on video output, as it has 3 display ports: RGB, LVDS and HDMI. The extrenal storage on card is also not neglected,  as provedn by the Nitrogen6X‘s dual SD/SDXC card slots. Other connectors include 2 USB ports, Gigabit Ethernet, SATA, headphone and microphone jacks, PCIe, two camera ports and, of course, GPIO pins. The Nitrogen6X sells for a higher price, 199$, but this price includes a 4GB memory card with Linux (but it can also run Android and Windows CE), a serial cable and a power cord.


  • Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A9 processor at 1 GHz
  • 1 GB of 64-bit wide DDR3 @ 532 MHz
  • 2MB Serial Flash
  • Three display ports (PRGB, LVDS, HDMI)
  • Parallel camera port with OV5642 Interface
  • Multi-stream-capable HD video engine delivering 1080p60 decode, 1080p30 encode and 3-D video playback in HD
  • Superior 3-D graphics performance with quad shaders for up to 200 Mt/s
  • Separate 2-D and/or Vertex acceleration engines for an optimal user interface experience
  • Serial ATA (SATA)
  • Dual SDHC card slots
  • PCI express port
  • Analog (headphone/mic) Audio
  • 10/100/1G Ethernet with Power over Ethernet support
  • 2 RS-232 Serial ports
  • 10-pin JTAG interface
  • 3 High speed USB ports (2x Host, 1x OTG)
  • CAN port
  • TiWi 802.11 b/g/n WiFi+BT optional
  • Supports Android 4, Embedded Linux, and WinCE7.0 Operating Systems
  • Industrial Temperature Versions Available
  • Custom Versions Available
  • Dimensions: 11.4 * 7.6 cm


Sabre Lite

Sabre Lite

Sabre Lite is a development board extremely similar to the Nitrogen6X (they are both produced by Boundary Devices). It has the same price of 199$, but it is smaller (7.6 x 7.6 cm). They both have the same CPU and memory, the connectors are also pretty much the same, the biggest difference being that Sabre Lite does not have WiFi.


  • Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A9 processor at 1 GHz
  • 1 GB of 64-bit wide DDR3 @ 532 MHz
  • Three display ports (RGB, LVDS, and HDMI 1.4a)
  • Two camera ports (1xParallel, 1x MIPI CSI-2)
  • Multi-stream-capable HD video engine delivering
  • H.264 1080p60 decode, 1080p30 encode and 3-D video playback in HD
  • Triple Play Graphics system consisting of a Quad-shader 3D unit capable of 200MT/s, and a separate 2-D and separate OpenVG Vertex acceleration engine for superior 3D, 2D and user interface acceleration
  • Serial ATA 2.5 (SATA) at 3 Gbps
  • Dual SD 3.0/SDXC card slots
  • PCIe port (1 lane)
  • Analog (headphone/mic) and Digital (HDMI) audio
  • 10/100/Gb IEEE1588 Ethernet
  • 10-pin JTAG interface
  • 3 High speed USB ports (2xHost, 1xOTG)
  • 1xCAN2 port
  • I2C
  • GPIOs
  • Dimensions: 7.6 x 7.6 cm




The IGEPv2 single-board computer, developed by ISEE, is meant to be an “industrial processor board”. Powered by an ARM Cortex-A8 processor running at 1 GHz and havin 512 MB of RAM, it offers more than decent performance. It also has 512 MB of built-in flash memory for storage, which can be extended via a micro-SD card. It can connect to a newtrok through built-in WiFi, Ethernet or BlueTooth and it outputs video through an HDMI port. It also has several other connectors, like 2x USB, 3x UART, audio stereo in and out and, of course, GPIO. Available for 188$, it runs Linux and Android and has a size of 9.5 by 6.5 cm.


  • DM3730 Texas Instruments processor
  • ARM Cortex-A8 1 GHz
  • C64+ DSP 800 MHz
  • 3D Accelerator SGX530 @ 200 MHz
  • Camera ISP
  • 512 Megabytes RAM / 512 Megabytes FLASH
  • Ethernet 10/100 Mb BaseT
  • Wifi 802.11 b/g
  • Bluetooth BC4 – Class 2.0
  • Video: DVI-D (HDMI Connector) programmable panel size
  • 2 x USB
  • MicroSD card reader
  • 3 x UART
  • Stereo audio in/out
  • Expansion connectors
  • Dimensions: 9.5 x 6.5 cm




This product from VIA, the APC, is a gadget that is meant to be a rival of the Raspberry Pi. If the name didn’t give it away already, the APC is an Android PC and is meant to run an older version of Android, 2.3, but surely people will find ways to run newer version of Android and even Linux on it. It is a Neo-ITX board, a fairly small (17 x 8.5 cm) PC, but nearly as small as the Raspberry Pi. But their is another dimension in which the VIA APC falls very close to its rival: the price. Selling for 49$, it offers somewhat better performance, with a VIA WonderMedia 8750 800 MHz ARM11 processor, 512MB of DDR3 memory, and 2GB of built-in NAND flash storage, something that the Pi does not possess. The chip supports 1080p HD video playback, H.264 video encoding, and OpenGL ES 2.0 graphics, but the video output of the device is not 1080p, only 720p. There is something, though which is a lot better on the VIA APC than on the Raspberry Pi: it offers a much wider range of connectors. It has a VGA and an HDMI port, 4 USB 2.0 ports, a 10/100 Ethernet port, a headphone and a microphone jack, and a micro-SD card slot for external storage. On the other hand it has no GPIO pins and its power consumption in incomparably higher than the Pi’s: 4W in idle mode and up to 14 W under load.


  • CPU: VIA WonderMedia 8750 ARM11 @ 800 MHz
  • GPU: 1080p HD video playback, H.264 video encoding, OpenGL ES 2.0
  • Memory: 512 MB DDR3
  • Internal storage: 2GB NAND flash
  • Extrenal storage: micro-SD card slot
  • Connectors:
    • HDMI
    • VGA
    • 4x USB 2.0
    • 10/100 Ethernet
    • 3.5 mm headphone + microphone jacks
  • Dimensions: 17 x 8.5 cm (Neo-ITX)


Arndale Board

Arndale Board

Although not quite as small as the other single-board computers presented here, Samsung‘s Arndale Board is quite an interesting piece of hardware that is certainly worth being mentioned. The 36 by 24 centimeters large board is available for 249$, which is significantly higher than the price of many other single-board computers, but the Arndale Board really does offer a lot for that money. First of all theres a lot of horse power packed under its hood. Built around Samsung‘s Exynos 5 SoC, ‘the Arndale Board is powered by a Cortex-A15 dual-core CPU running at 1.7 GHz and a Mali T604 GPU, which offers high graphics performance. In fact, Google’s Nexus 10 tablet has the same CPU and GPU at its heart. The Arndale Board comes with 2 GB of RAM and 4 GB of internal storage memory but external storage can be added through the micro-SD card slot, through SATA or even USB. There are two USB 2.0 and one USB 3.0 ports available on the board, HDMI, Ethernet, Serial R232C and JTAG connectors. What really differentiates this board from the rest is the possibility to easily connect different add-on modules to it, a touch display, camera or NFC board for example. It also has some neat built-in modules like the GPS module, compass  gyroscope and accelerometer. As the Arndale Board too is based on the ARM architecture,  the operating systems that are best fit for it are Android and Linux.


  • CPU:
    • Cortex-A15 @ 1.7 GHz dual core subsystem with 64/128 bit SIMD NEON
    • 32 KB (instruction) / 32 KB (DATA) L1 cache and 1 MB L2 cache
  • GPU: Mali T604
  • Memory: 32-bit 800 Mhz DDR3 (L) /DDR3 1 GB x 2
  • Built-in storage: 4 GB
  • Connectivity:
    • 100 Mbps Ethernet
    • WiFi
    • Bluetooth
  • External storage:
    • micro-SD card slot
    • SATA 1.0/2.0/3.0 interface
    • One channel eMMC 4.5
    • One channel SDIO 3.0
    • Two channel SD 2.0
  • Interfaces:
    • Sensor
      • Accelerator : Invensence MPU-6050
      • Gyro : Invensence MPU-6050
      • e-Compass : AKM -AK8963C
      • GPS module
    • ITU 601 camera Interface
    • HDMI 1.4 interfaces with on-chip PHY
    • One channel eDP output Single WQXGA
    • MIPI DSI Standard Specification V1.01r11
    • MIPI CSI Standard Specification V1.0 Two ports
    • USB 3.0 Host or Device 1-channel that supports SS (5Gbps) with on-chip PHY
    • USB 2.0 Host or Device 1-channel that supports LS/FS/HS with on-chip PHY
    • USB HSIC 2-channel that supports 480Mbps with on-chip PHY
    • Four channel high-speed UART (up to 3Mbps data rate for Bluetooth 2.0 EDR and IrDA 1.0SIR)
    • Three channel high-speed SPI
    • Three channel 24-bit I2S audio interface
    • Four channel I2C interface support , up to 400kbps
    • Four channel HS-I2C up to 3.1Mps
  • Dimensions: 36 x 24 cm


Origen Board

Origen Board


Not so much different from the Arndale Board is the Origen Board. Also a product of Samsung, it is based on the Exynos 4 SoC (the previous generation) and it’s CPU is a Cortex-A9 running at a slightly lower frequency, 1.4 GHz, but it is quad-core, not dual-core. It is the same processor found in the Samsung Galaxy S III smartphone. The GPU is the popular Mali-400. The Origen Board has 1GB of DDR3 RAM and no built-in storage memory. External storage is available via an SD card slot. Other than that it features two USB 2.0 ports, an Ethernet port, one UART connector, one HDMI connector and some interfaces to connect external modules like an LCD, a camera, a WiFi module and sensors (GPS for example). Selling for 199$, Origen Board is meant to run Android and Linux primarily.


  • CPU Board
    • CPU : Samsung Exynos 4 Quad Cortex-A9 core 1.4 GHz
    • DRAM : 1GB (POP Type)
    • PMIC : S5M8767A
    • GPU: Mali-400
  • Base Board
    • SDcard, Serial, USB 2.0 Host x 2, USB 2.0 Device
    • JTAG , Ethernet (10/100 Mbps), HDMI support
  • Connector support (Sub Boards)
    • External I/F
    • MIPI CSI/DSI , Parallel, C2C
  • LCD & Touch Package
    • LCD : 7″ LCD (1024 x 600)
    • Touch : Capacitive sensing Touch screen 7″
    • I/O Board : Connector module for LCD & Touch
  • Accessories Package
    • AC Adapter(5V 2~3A)
    • SD Card(4G Bytes)
    • HDMI, Serial, USB Cable
  • Sub Boards
    • Sound Board
      • AsahiKASEI : AK4678
    • Connectivity Board
      • MediaTeK : MT6620 4 in 1
  • Dimensions: 11.9 x 11.9 cm


Toradex Topaz Single Board Computer and Xiilun

Toradex Topaz Single Board Computer

The Toradex Topaz Single Board Computer is a system that tries to stand out in several ways from the crowd of existing single-board micro computers. Announced in early 2011, the Topaz is built upon the x86 architecture and is powered by an Intel Atom E6xx processor running at up to 1.6 Ghz (with hyper-threading and virtualization technology), which can deliver unusually high performance for a board of this size (8.4 x 5.5 x 1.27 cm). The x86 architecture also has the advantage of being able to work with all major operating systems (including Windows). The graphics processor is an Intel GMA600 clocked at 400 MHz, supporting two independent displays (through the HDMI and DVI-D connectors), OpenGL ES 2.0, OpenVG, and DirectX 9.0, and of course full HD resolution. The Topaz system can have 1 or 2 GB of DDR2 memory attached. In spite of its high performance this board is said to consume very little current. The processor itself uses a maximum of 3.9 W according to Intel. The low power consumption is obviously a huge advantage because if such a high performance board can be used in battery-powered applications, that means a whole new world of possibilities. And there really is nothing stopping the Topaz from being part of such custom systems, as it offers a 50-pin expansion header (which can be utilized, among other things for SATA and PCIe connections too).

Together with the Topaz single-board computer was announced Xiilun, which is basically a Topaz board in a robust aluminium case, only slightly larger than the board itself: 8.9 x 6.0 x 1.6 cm. In fact, it was marketed as the world’s smallest single-board computer. That may already not be true today, but it certainly is a small box full of power. The aluminium case helps dissipate the produced heat and allows for fan-less operation.


  • CPU: Intel Atom E6xx (up to 1.6GHz) with Intel® IOH EG20T chipset:
    • Intel Hyper Threading
    • Intel Virtualization Technology
  • Memory:  1GB – 2GB DDR2 RAM (32Bit, 800MT)
  • GPU: Intel GMA600 (400 MHz):
    • Resolution: Up to Full HD (1920×1080)
    • Dual Independent Display
    • OpenGL ES 2.0
    • OpenVGTM
    • DirectX 9.0c
    • Video encoding: MPEG4, H.264, MPEG2, MPEG4, VC1, WMV9, H.264
  • Connectors:
    • 1x DVI-D (on HDMI connector)
    • 4x high-speed USB 2.0
    • Interfaces on Expansion Connectors :
      • 1x LVDS Single Channel
      • 2x PCIe
      • 2x High-Speed USB 2.0
      • 2x SATA
      • 1x Intel® High Definition Audio
      • 1x SDIO (4bit)
      • 1x LPC
      • 1x SMB
      • 1x I2C
      • 4x GPIO
      • 2x UART (RS232)
      • 1x CAN
  • External storage: micro-SD card slot (SDHC)
  • Power Supply: 5 VDC
  • Dimensions:  5.5 x 8.4 x 1.27 cm




Another micro computer that does not joke around when it comes to performance is the VIA EPIA-910 Pico-ITX board. Equipped with a VIA quad-core E-series x86 processor, with all 4 cores running at 1 GHz and offering the possibility to install up to 8 GB of laptop-size DDR3 memory into it, this system is a powerhouse. Its Chromotion 640 video processor (VIA VX11H media system processor) is also very muscular, having no problems with 3D applications, 1080p movie playback or anything else for the matter. Gamers will happily note that is DirectX 11 compatible. The fact that the system is built on the x86 architecture, not ARM, has the huge advantage of being able to run virtually any OS: Linux, Android, OS X, Windows, you name it. It offers so much in such a tiny package: the Pico-ITX standard dictates its size of only 10 x 7.2 cm. unfortunately there is something that is not tiny at all: the price. VIA EPIA-910 sells for no less than 359$. But hey, if you want heavy performance packed in a tiny computer, you’ll have to pay for it. At list some essentials are included in the price: a power supply and SATA data and power cables.

As for the connectivity options, this board delivers video through HDMI and VGA. It also has 2 standard USB 3.0 ports, an Ethernet port and two SATA connectors for extended storage. It has no GPIO pins but that it not so surprising since it’s not really meant to be a development board, it’s meant to be a powerful tiny computer. An optional expansion board adds PS/2 ports, 6 more USB 2.0 ports, 2 more USB 3.0 ports, and audio jacks.

A big aluminium heat sink can sit on the top of the board and even a fan can be installed on it, but that kind of spoils all the fun of having a small and noiseless computer.


  • CPU: VIA quad-core E-series x86 processor @ 1 GHz
  • GPU: Chromotion 640 video processor (VIA VX11H media system processor)
    • DirectX 11 compatible
    • 1080p full HD video playback
  • Memory: up to 8GB DD3, up to 1333 MHz
  • Connectors:
    • HDMI
    • VGA
    • 2x USB 3.0
    • 2x SATA
    • Ethernet
  • Dimensions: 10 x 7.2 cm (Pico-ITX)


Intel NUC

Intel NUC

Intel’s response to the micro computer craze is the NUC (Next Unit of Computing), which might not be as small as the rest of the boards (it’s 10 x 10 cm), but than again it’s not that large either and it’s packed in a very elegant case and… it boils with performance. Unsurprisingly this small computer too is x86-based, being able to run most any OS (including Windows).

In the beginning NUC is being sold in two flavors: DC3217IYE and DC3217BY, both based on dual-core Core i3-3217U microprocessor (1.8GHz, 3MB cache, 17W TDP) with Intel HD Graphics 4000 graphics core and QS77 core-logic, but there might be other variations in the future, as it can accept any Intel Core i3 or i5 CPUs. The current models can be equipped with two DDR3 SO-DIMMs, an mSATA solid-state drive and a mini PCIe Wi-Fi/Bluetooth module. The DC3217IYE has 2 HDMI ports and  an 1 Gb Ethernet port, the DC3217BY has just one HDMI output, one Thunderbolt port, but lacks the 1 Gb Ethernet port. None of the two models has analog audio connectors.

The NUC clearly packs a lot of power inside its elegant case. Unfortunately its price is also impressive, somewhere around 300-320$ for the board itself, the CPU, the case and a 65 W power supply (so, yes, it consumes considerably more power than the other micro computers). Add the price of the memory, that of the SSD and that of a WiFi card and you’re probably looking at almost 500$. It is probably the most powerful solution in this size class today and we must admit, it looks really good, but as all good things, it comes at a high price. Also, a heat sink and a fan cannot be avoided for such a powerful micro computer.


  • CPU: Intel Core i3 or i5 (current models have i3-3217U @ 1.8 GHz with 3 MB cache)
  • GPU: Intel HD Graphics 4000
  • Memory: 2x DDR3 SO-DIMM (sold separately)
  • Storage: mSATA SSD (sold separately)
  • Connectivity: 1Gb Ethernet or mini PCIe WiFi module
  • Video/audio output: 1x or 2x HDMI ports
  • Other connectors: USB 3.0, Thunderbolt
  • Dimensions: 10 x 10 cm.




An interesting class of devices emerged recently. They are what we might call HDMI Android sticks. A good example of such a device is the UG802, which is essentially a very small micro PC, packaged in the form very similar to a USB pen drive. The impressively tiny (8.9 x 3.3 x 1.6 cm) gadget has an HDMI connector on one end, which you can connect directly to a TV, for example. It also has USB ports and a micro-SD card slot for external storage, but the UG802 already includes 4 GB of built-in storage. It is powered by a Rockchip RK3066 ARM Cortex-A9 dual-core processor clocked at 1.6 GHz and it has 1GB of RAM. Its video processor is the popular Mali-400. Built-in WiFi allows for easy networking.

The UG802 is meant to offer comfortable usage. You just plug it into some HMDI-capable screen, attach a keyboard and mouse and use it. It runs Android 4.0 out of the box but several Linux distributions have also been ported to work on it.

If you wish to have a tiny, well packaged device to use for common multimedia purposes (movies, games, etc.), the UG802 is a good choice and you can get it for as little as 69$. It is not suitable for custom hardware projects, simply because it has no general purpose connectors on it, but it never was meant to be used in such way.


  • CPU: Rockchip RK3066 ARM Cortex-A9 dual core processor @ 1.6 GHz
  • GPU: Mali-400
  • Memory: 1GB
  • Internal storage: 4GB
  • External storage: micro-SD card slot
  • Ports and connections: USB, HDMI, built-in Wi-Fi
  • Dimensions: 8.9 x 3.3 x 1.6 cm




Another HDMI Android stick, strikingly similar to the UG802 is the MK802. This one has a single-core 1.5 GHz AllWinner A10 Cortex-A8 ARM processor, 512MB of DDR3 memory, the same Mali-400 GPU, the same 4 GB flash memory storage and the same micro-SD card slot. The other connectors are also pretty much the same: 2 USB ports and built-in WiFi connectivity. The MK802 sells for 74$ and, just as the UG802, it runs Android 4.0 and several Linux distributions.


  • CPU: AllWinner A10 Cortex-A8 ARM (single-core, 1.5 GHz)
  • GPU: Mali-400
  • Memory: 512 MB
  • Internal storage: 4GB
  • External storage: micro-SD card slot
  • Ports and connections: USB, HDMI, built-in Wi-Fi
  • 8.79 x 3.5 x 1.34 cm


Cotton Candy

Cotton Candy

One of the first HDMI Android sticks to be announced was the Cotton Candy. Just like the UG802 or MK802, it’s essentially a micro PC in the form of a pen drive, having an HDMI connector on one and and a USB port on the other. The specs of the Cotton Candy are pretty much the same as those of the UG802 and MK802 (1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A9 processor, 1 GB of RAM, quad-core Mali-400 MP GPU, no built-in storage flash memory, built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, HDMI, USB 2.0, micro-SD slot), and yet its price is magnitudes higher compared to the other two: 199$! Just like the other tow gadgets, it runs Android and Linux.


  • CPU: AllWinner Cortex-A9 ARM (dual-core, 1.2 GHz)
  • GPU: Mali-400 MP (quad-core)
  • Memory: 1 GB
  • Internal storage: none
  • External storage: micro-SD card slot
  • Ports and connections: USB, HDMI, built-in Wi-Fi
  • 8 x 2.5 cm


Mele A1000

Mele A1000

The Mele A1000 comes in a different package compared to the other micro computers presented. It is not without a case, like the Raspberry Pi, for example, nor is it in a pen drive form like the UG802, MK802 or the Cotton Candy. It is packaged and thought of as a multimedia TV box. Available for 70$, the Mele A1000 is equipped with a 1 GHz Allwinner A10 ARM Cortex-A8 processor, a Mali-400 GPU, 512 MB of RAM and 4 GB internal NAND flash memory. It includes WiFi but also has an Ethernet connector. Video output is through HDMI, VGA and composite video. It also has 2 USB ports and a SD card slot. External hard drives can be connected through the SATA interface. The Mele A1000 runs Android 2.3 by default, but it is possible to make it work with Linux too.


  • CPU: AllWinner A10 Cortex-A8 ARM @ 1 GHz
  • GPU: Mali-400
  • Memory: 512 MB
  • Internal storage: 4 GB NAND flash
  • External storage: SD card slot, sata interface
  • Video: HDMI, VGA, composite video
  • Network: Built-in WiFi, Ethernet connector
  • Other ports: 2x USB




Just like the name suggests, CuBox is a very small computer that has the form of a cube. It is a very small cube (5.1 x 5.1 x 5.1 cm) packed with hardware goodies. Based on the Marvell Armada 510 (88AP510) SoC, with an ARM v6/v7-compliant processor (800 MHz dual issue ARM PJ4 processor), a Vivante GC600 2D and 3D capable hardware accelerated graphic engine and having 1 GB of 800 MHz DDR3 RAM, the CuBox is quite a powerful little box and yet it runs happily on less than 3 W of power (and less than 1 W in stand-by). It has full HD HDMI output, Gigabit Ethernet and 2 USB 2.0 ports. But this small box offers a few less conventional connectors too, like SPDIF, 3 Gbps eSATA or the infrared receiver. It also has a micro-USB console and a micro-SD (SDXC) card slot for external storage.

An amazingly vast palette of operating systems are supported (documented) by CuBox:

  • Linux
    • ArchLinux
    • Ångström
    • CRUX
    • Fedora
    • GeeXboX
    • Gentoo
    • Mer
    • openSUSE
    • Xilka
    • Debian
    • Ubuntu
  • Android
    • Android 2.2

Whether it’s used as a low-power desktop computer, as a server or as a media box, the CuBox offers a lot. Unfortunately the price reflects this and is quite high: you can buy this gadget for 140$.


  • CPU: 800 MHz dual issue ARM PJ4 processor
  • GPU: Vivante GC600 2D and 3D capable hardware accelerated graphic engine
  • Memory: 1 GB DDR3 @ 800 MHz
  • Connectors:
    • HDMI
    • 2x USB 2.0
    • Gigabit Ethernet
    • SPDIF
    • eSATA I/II
    • Standard IrDA Infra-red receiver for 38KHz based IR controllers
    • MicroUSB USB Device / Console for flashing
  • Extrenal storage: micro-SD (SDXC) card slot
  • Dimensions: 5.1 x 5.1 x 5.1 cm
  • Weight: 91 g

An extremely detailed list of the CuBox’s hardware specifications can be found here.


Mini Xplus

Mini XPlus

Mini Xplus is a small PC meant to be a TV box and is packaged as such. Powered by an AllWinner A10 ARM Cortex-A8 processor running at 1 GHz and a Mali-400 GPU, it has 1 GB of RAM and 4 GB of NAND flash for internal storage. External storage is possible via micro-SD cards. The device has two USB 2.0 ports, an HDMI port and, obviously, built-in WiFi. It sells for 69$ or more and runs Android or Linux.


  • CPU: AllWinner A10 ARM Cortex-A8 @ 1 GHz
  • GPU: Mali-400
  • RAM: 1GB
  • Internal storage: 4GB NAND flash
  • External storage: micro-SD card slot
  • Connectivity: built-in WiFi.
  • Connectors:
    • 1x HDMI
    • 2x USB 2.0
  • Dimensions: 6 x 6 x 1.0 cm




As the name suggests, the SheevaPlug is a plug-type micro computer designed to run server applications. Its two successors, the the GuruPlug and DreamPlug, are similar to it, with slightly different specs. While SheevaPlug runs Ubuntu 9.04, GuruPlug and DreamPlug work with Debian Linux. The SheevaPlug sells for around 159$.


  • CPU: 1.2 GHz ARM Marvell Kirkwood 88F6281 (ARM9E)
  • Memory: 512 MB
  • Internal storage: 512 MB flash
  • External storage: external HDD, SDIO card, SD card
  • Network: Gigabit Ethernet
  • Other connectors: USB 2.0
  • Dimensions: 11 x 6.95 x 4.85 cm



Now that we’ve seen so many single-board micro computers, let us compare their different attributes and characteristics using charts and tables.

CPU Frequency



Price of 1 CPU MHz

Price of 1 MB RAM

Name Architecture Supported OS
VIA Pico-ITX Epia-P910 x86 Windows, OS X, Linux, Android, etc.
VIA APC ARM Android, Linux
UG802 ARM Android, Linux
Toradex Topaz SBC x86 Windows, OS X, Linux, Android, etc.
Snowball Board ARM Android, Linux, etc.
SheevaPlug ARM Linux
SABRE Lite ARM Linux, Android, Windows CE
Raspberry Pi Model B ARM Linux (Raspbian), RISC OS, Android
Raspberry Pi Model A ARM Linux (Raspbian), RISC OS, Android
PandaBoard ES ARM Linux, Android, RISC OS
Origen Board ARM Android, Linux
Olimex A13 OLinuXino ARM Linux, Android
ODROID-U2 ARM Android, Linux
ODROID-X2 ARM Android, Linux
Nitrogen6X ARM Linux, Android, Windows CE
MK802 ARM Android, Linux
Mele A1000 ARM Android, Linux
Intel NUC x86 Windows, OS X, Linux, Android, etc.
IGEPv2 ARM Linux, Android
Hackberry Board ARM Android, Linux
Gooseberry Board ARM Android, Linux
FoxG20 ARM Linux
CuBox ARM Linux, Android
Cubieboard ARM Linux, Android
Cotton Candy ARM Android, Linux
Chumby Hacker Board ? Linux
Beaglebone ARM Linux (Angstrom, Uubuntu), Android
Arndale Board ARM Android, Linux
Name Size 1 (cm) Size 2 (cm) Thickness (cm)
VIA Pico-ITX Epia-P910 10 7.2 ?
VIA APC 17 8.5 ?
UG802 8.9 3.3 1.6
Toradex Topaz SBC 5.5 8.4 1.27
Snowball Board 8.5 8.5 ?
SheevaPlug 11 6.95 4.85
SABRE Lite 8.25 8.25 ?
Raspberry Pi Model B 8.56 5.6 2.1
Raspberry Pi Model A 8.56 5.6 2.1
PandaBoard ES 11.4 10.2 ?
Origen Board 13.9 11.9 ?
Olimex A13 OLinuXino 12 12 1.65
ODROID-U2 4.8 5.2 ?
ODROID-X2 9 9.4 ?
Nitrogen6X 11.4 7.6 ?
MK802 8.79 3.5 1.34
Mele A1000 ? ? ?
Intel NUC 10 10 ?
IGEPv2 9.3 6.5 ?
Hackberry Board 8.56 5.4 0
Gooseberry Board ? ? ?
FoxG20 ? ? ?
CuBox 5.1 5.1 5.1
Cubieboard 10 6 2
Cotton Candy 8 2.5 ?
Chumby Hacker Board 10 6 1
Beaglebone 8.64 5.33 ?
Arndale Board 36 24 7
Name Onboard Storage (MB) Extrenal Storage
VIA Pico-ITX Epia-P910 0 SATA, USB
VIA APC 2048 microSD, USB
UG802 4096 microSD, TF, USB
Toradex Topaz SBC 0 microSD, SATA, USB
Snowball Board 8192 microSD
SheevaPlug 512 SD, USB
SABRE Lite 0 dual SD / SDXC
Raspberry Pi Model B 0 SDHC, USB
Raspberry Pi Model A 0 SDHC, USB
PandaBoard ES 0 SD, MMC, USB
Origen Board 0 SD, USB
Olimex A13 OLinuXino 0 SD, USB
ODROID-U2 0 microSD, USB
Nitrogen6X 0 dual SDHC
MK802 4096 microSD, USB
Mele A1000 0 SD, SATA, USB
IGEPv2 512 microSD
Hackberry Board 4096 SDHC, USB
Gooseberry Board 4096 microSD
FoxG20 0.25 microSD
CuBox 0 microSD
Cubieboard 4096 microSD, SATA, USB
Cotton Candy 0 microSD, USB
Chumby Hacker Board 0 microSD, USB
Beaglebone 0 microSD, USB
Arndale Board 0 microSD, SATA, USB
Name HDMI Port VGA Port
VIA Pico-ITX Epia-P910 Yes Yes
UG802 Yes No
Toradex Topaz SBC Yes No
Snowball Board Yes No
SheevaPlug No No
SABRE Lite Yes No
Raspberry Pi Model B Yes No
Raspberry Pi Model A Yes No
PandaBoard ES Yes No
Origen Board Yes Yes
Olimex A13 OLinuXino Yes Yes
Nitrogen6X Yes No
MK802 Yes No
Mele A1000 Yes Yes
Intel NUC Yes No
IGEPv2 Yes No
Hackberry Board Yes No
Gooseberry Board Yes No
FoxG20 No No
CuBox Yes No
Cubieboard Yes No
Cotton Candy Yes No
Chumby Hacker Board No No
Beaglebone No No
Arndale Board Yes Yes
Name Ethernet Port Built-in WiFi
VIA Pico-ITX Epia-P910 Yes No
UG802 No Yes
Toradex Topaz SBC No No
Snowball Board Yes Yes
SheevaPlug Yes No
SABRE Lite Yes No
Raspberry Pi Model B Yes No
Raspberry Pi Model A No No
PandaBoard ES Yes Yes
Origen Board Yes No
Olimex A13 OLinuXino No No
Nitrogen6X Yes No
MK802 No Yes
Mele A1000 Yes No
Intel NUC Yes Yes
IGEPv2 Yes Yes
Hackberry Board Yes Yes
Gooseberry Board No Yes
FoxG20 Yes No
CuBox Yes No
Cubieboard Yes No
Cotton Candy No Yes
Chumby Hacker Board No No
Beaglebone Yes No
Arndale Board Yes No
Name Standard USB (2.0/3.0) Ports GPIO Pins
VIA Pico-ITX Epia-P910 2 YES
UG802 1 No
Toradex Topaz SBC 4 Yes
Snowball Board 0 YES
SheevaPlug 1 No
SABRE Lite 2 Yes
Raspberry Pi Model B 2 Yes
Raspberry Pi Model A 1 Yes
PandaBoard ES 2 Yes
Origen Board 2 No
Olimex A13 OLinuXino 3 Yes
Nitrogen6X 2 Yes
MK802 2 No
Mele A1000 2 No
Intel NUC 3 No
IGEPv2 2 Yes
Hackberry Board 2 No
Gooseberry Board 0 no
FoxG20 2 Yes
CuBox 2 No
Cubieboard 2 Yes
Cotton Candy 1 No
Chumby Hacker Board 3 Yes
Beaglebone 1 Yes
Arndale Board 3 Yes



Looking at the above charts, we can immediately draw some obvious conclusions:

  • ODROID-X2 and ODROID-U2 offer the most CPU power and the most RAM
  • Other high-end boards are: Origen Board, Arndale Board, Nitrogen6X, Sabre Lite and Via Epia-P910
  • The low-end boards are: Chumby Hacker Board and FoxG20
  • The smallest devices are: Cotton Candy, UG802, CuBox and ODROID-U2
  • The largest devices are: Arndale Board, Origen Board, VIA APC and Olimex A13 OLinuXino
  • The cheapest single-board micro computer is the Raspberry Pi (both model A and B)
  • The most expensive devices are the VIA Epia-P910, the Intel NUC, the Arndale Board and the Snowball Board
  • The best performance/cost ratio comes from ODROID-U2, ODROID-X2, Raspberry Pi, UG802, MK802, Cubieboard, VIA APC and HAckberry Board.
  • The best RAM/cost ratio can be found in ODROID-U2, HAckberry Board and Raspberry Pi model B.

But there are some other, less obvious facts that need to be taken into consideration when choosing one of the presented devices. First of all, one must consider the purpose for which the device will be used. The architecture of the board (x86 or ARM) plays a crucial role here, as some operating systems (like Windows) are less likely to run smoothly on ARM devices, while others, like Linux or Android work perfectly on them. Also, it is very important to consider the available types of connectors on the boards and maybe even their quantity (especially for USB). Video output type and quality may be one of the most important ones (HDMI, VGA or other), but network connectivity (WiFi, Ethernet, BlueTooth) also plays an important role. The presence of GPIO pins on the boards may matter if they will be used in custom hardware projects.

Last, but not least, it is important to consider how stable a device is when running a certain OS and how large the community and how good the support is around it. The Raspberry Pi, being the most famous of these micro computers, enjoys the best support from its community so if you run into some problems, you are likely to get help fast. This may not be true with some other devices.


Final note

Although I’ve done my best to gather and structure the information about the presented single-board micro computers as accurately as possible, it may happen that there are errors or missing/wrong data. If you find such a mistake, feel free to leave a comment containing the correction.


This article has been created in collaboration with:

NailGlaze.comThe Must Blog


An overview and comparison of today’s single-board micro computers — 60 Comments

  1. Nice work.
    I use olimex imx233 (not mentioned) and A13. I evaluated cubieboard. I found it was probably a superior hardware product to the Olimex in that perofrmance category (512MB RAM, Cortex A8 1Gig) but the forum and general activity is not as great as Olimex.
    The new A10 olimex board will be by next board of choice.

  2. The MK802 does not run at 1.5GHz. It is only clocked at 1GHz, but was commonly mis-advertised as 1.5.

    The BeagleBone has been superceded by the BeagleBone Black, which increases the speed to 1GHz, RAM to 512MB DDR3, adds 2G of flash onboard, and an HDMI port.

    You comment that the BeagleBone has the same performance as the Raspberry Pi, and the CubieBoard slightly faster than Pi performance. This is not correct. The type of ARM CPU in the Pi is an older, slower generation model, and it also has quite slow disk i/o to the SD card.
    In actual use, or in benchmarks, the BeagleBone (white) is significantly faster than the Pi – twice as fast in benchmarks, but even faster in real-world feel. The CubieBoard is then a bit faster than that. I’d anticipate the new BeagleBone Black will be faster than the CubieBoard but I haven’t had a chance to use one yet.

  3. That first graph is the most hilarious thing I’ve ever seen. You went to such effort to create a nice graph, but it’s completely and utterly WRONG. MHz is the clock speed. All 4 cores are using the same clock for timing. Trying to multiply the clock speed by the number of cores for the “real speed” just shows that you don’t understand what these numbers mean or how they interact at all.

    I was going to read the whole article but after seeing that graph, I don’t need to. I can conclude it was written by a clueless person and hence it’s almost certainly of little value or quality.

    • By “4 cores” I was referring to the ODROID-X2, which your graph claims is running at nearly 7000MHz.

      4 cores clocked at 1.7Ghz is NOT “6.8 GHz” it’s just 4 cores clocked at 1.7Ghz. Get my point? There is only 1 clock shared between the 4 cores. That’s the whole f*cking point of multi-core CPUs. Having 4 cores doesn’t magically increase the clock frequency by a factor of 4. It’s not necessarily equivalent in terms of performance either, before you try to use that as an excuse for your stupidity.

      • Thank you for your comment. Please excuse my desire to offer something to the community which might help them decide which board is best. Also please excuse my attempt to visualize multi-core clock speed on a graph. It seems that I am really “stupid”, as you say, and have no clue about what multi-core clock speed means 😉 Perhaps I was trying to visualize the speed of multi-threaded applications which are able to make use of all cores. Obviously, having 4 cores running at 1.7 GHz will not give you a speed equivalent to 6.8 GHz, even if the software is very well optimized for running on multiple threads. The OS needs to synchronize the threads and so on. But it might give you a speed equivalent to, say 6 GHz if it were running on a single core. But, as I said, perhaps I don’t know what the hack I’m talking about. You’re welcome to explain your own point of view 😉

  4. Great article. I rarely post comments, but wanted to mention, Craig is “technically” correct on the “combined frequency” but incorrect that the “whole point” of multi-core is to run at the same frequency. The point of multiple cores, and multi-path, is to distribute the computing power to increase performance. Although there are certainly losses in distribution of work among the cores, the graph is nice to a show there is an advantage and “combined power” of multiple cores and highlights the power houses from a performance stand point. Keep up the good work!

  5. Nice overview of a lot of boards!

    There is one more that we use beacause of it’s low pricing ($69), and miniPCI-E port:’s pico-SAM9G45.

  6. Great article, really enjoyed reading through it. Just missed 1 thingy: the weight of the tested boards.
    if u wanna use it for a quadrocoptor, a mini google automatic car or something similar both size and weight are an issue. For the rest.. great work.

  7. Thanks for the helpful overview! I discovered these little gems the other day and have been researching their capabilities and I’m very interested and extremely excited by the possibilities these devices offer. I’m however quite confused as to what would be the best choice for my purposes, but this guide helps a bit.

    Based on my experience with ARM technology in mobile/cell phones, I assume the operating speeds would be similar in sbc’s, so having a newer model, higher frequency cpu, and more RAM is the way to go if running GUI intensive environments such as XBMC.

    My problem comes down to needing the device to have built in wifi or the option to expand the motherboard; compatible with wireless usb keyboard and mouse; built in or expansion for GPIO; ability to program, and all the flexibility of the Pi. I’m also not sure if the OS has to be tweaked before able to run on your preferred device. I have lots of PC (hardware and software) and HTC phone experience but zero linux experience, I don’t necessarily want to go with the device that offers the most technical/user support, but if the OS and additional programs need modifying before they can be run on a sbp then that might be the deciding factor. Can I assume that if a copy of say, xmbc runs fine on an A10 processor then it would run fine on any device with the same processor, say, an Allwinner A10 ARM Cortex-A8?

    I’m currently a student with very limited disposable money otherwise I wouldn’t mind buying a few different devices and testing them all out myself. Part of my concern is that if I commit to one device, I would appreciate being able to easily know what peripherals, add on’s, programs et al work on the device before spending money as in some cases you can’t always return purchases after testing that they work.

    Thanks again for the overview, even if I was wondering how some of these devices had close to 7,000 mhz frequencies without seeing any of them for sale 🙂

    • Hi Stuart!

      Thanks for the positive words 🙂 Compatibility of software with such devices is always an issue. It’s hard to tell what will work on which. I’m no Linux expert either. As for the 7k Mhz, that should not be understood like that 🙂 Multi-core speed is a fictional thing. It just means the core speed multiplied by the number of cores. IT’s something used for an ideal comparison of devices. In reality the single core speed is what matters more, but of course, well written software will run much faster as the number of cores increases.

      • You’re welcome, and thanks for the reply! This was the best overview I’ve seen online, even the wikipedia comparison is quite limited and youtube videos are limited in terms of comparisons.

        I’ve discovered Element 14 which seems to have a good community behind them for these sorts of devices, so will utilise their knowledge base to work out which product would be best for me.

        Very exciting stuff, cheers! 😀

  8. Thank you for an excellent article. Missing one or the other obscure board is insignificant.
    Quibbling about the exact meaning/effect of multicoring is merely for the purpose of nitpicking. We all know the benefit of multithreading. The graphs are indicative of comparative performance gain and valid for the purpose her.

    You have done a laudable job Sir. I would ask craig to write his own better article if he can, instead of criticising the achievement of others.


  9. amazing article, needs updating, pretty please!!!
    eg oDroidU3 etc.

    could you please add info about camera sensor boards?
    at present afaict RPi is only one with camera board and blob giving access to GPU, openMAX, etc…

    GPU may have capability to encode-decode 1080p on the fly, but without camera they are of limited interest to this developer.
    apparently ISP licensing is a major issue.

  10. An excellent article!

    I have recently purchased a Pandaboard ES (OMAP4460) to be used for a openCV-based machine vision system I am working on. Unfortunately I did not have this excellent list of SBCs at purchase time otherwise I probably would have went with an ODroid…

    Thanks again.

  11. This is an incredible contribution, thanks and well done!

    PS: The BeagleBone Black is a new player worth mentioning. A major feature of this is the PRUs, which enable significant realtime capabilities (important for CNC, etc).

    • Nope, unfortunately I’m not updating the list. But I can say that lately I’ve been very impressed by Android TV sticks with RK3188 and RK3288 chip, so it’s worth taking a look at those too.

  12. it was a pleasure to me to find such a wide ranging comparison…
    and I can imagine that you’ve spent a couple of hours on it – thank you very much; it was a big help!

  13. Great job and the best article and comparision I read … loved the details you mentioned. It helped me a lot looking for an appropriate SoC so I decided to use CuBox with Ubuntu. My both RPIs are the best for media center (OpenELEC) but missed performance for desktop tasks.

    Thanks a lot!!!!!!!

    • Thanks for letting me know about these boards 🙂 At the time I wrote this article (a looong time ago), I did not know about their existence. Right now, however, I’m more fascinated about the new Raspberry Pi v2:

  14. Nice of you to take the time to compare features os such a wide range of devices, thanks for that!

    A couple o years down the line, are you aware of any low-power, low-cost (say, sub-$100) SBC with DUAL SATA?

    • Hi! Nope, unfortunately, I haven’t been following the development of boards that much lately. I only know that there’s the latest and greatest Raspberry Pi 2, a really powerful ODROID, the Intel Gallileo, etc. But none of them have dual SATA.

  15. good article. i definitely will add it to my bookmarks to reread later. but there are two things to note. first. such a good overview will be even better if it will be held up to date. some new boards are not covered at all. and second, in your conclusion about significance of the cpu architecture, you have made apparently wrong statement. namely comparing running Windows on arm as ‘not’ smooth, as oppose to android. this is blatant bias of course, i for example might say, that android sucks badly on arm but all this is just irrelevant to the overview. Windows on arm runs as fine as on x86, it’s a totally different question that it’s unavailable to install freely on some sbc. just like apple’s macosx. on the other hand, android specifically targets arm devices, and almost all vendors of these boards make their android distribution for their boards. have you the same possibility for Windows? no. it’s dissapointing for me for example, that microsoft does not wish to give arm NT as free distribution model as for x86 version. there is actually no arm desktop version of NT, only locked to oem’s device. i definitely will prefer NT on those arm sbc’s instead of android. but saying that Windows will not run smoothly on arm sbc where actually you have no possibility to check this is definitely wrong. yet again, i am sure NT will smoke that android easily.

    • Hi Valcot!

      Thanks for your comment.
      Yes, unfortunately I don’t have the time to keep up with the new boards, so the article is not updated.
      The comment about Windows not running well on ARM is meant to warn people that these are some nice little computers but they can’t use them for their everyday Windowsing. That’s because whenever I tell my friends about Raspberry Pi or other similar boards, the first question I get is: “so, can I throw out my large PC and replace it with this?!”. So people must be warned that they can’t run Windows on these, well, at least not for what they use Windows at home or at work, because RPI2 does run some sort of core Windows 10, but it’s not what people had hoped for…

  16. Thank you very much for a great review.
    Here is one thing which could make it even better.
    You said Cubieboard is like much the same as Biglebone and Raspbery but it seems pretty unique to me. According to your post it is an only board which has ADC inputs. It is a big deal for some applications.

  17. Awesome list!
    But i think this board:Z-turn board should be listed too.It is biult around Xilinx ZYNQ7020 with Xilinx 7-series FPGA logic and has 1GB DDR3 SDRAM on board.
    It is no strange that you missed this board, it only released at the year of 2015. I used it for my project, a pretty nice board, i think.

Leave a Reply to Karim Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.